Identity Theft Laws – The Way The Legal System Can Protect You


Not that long ago, people did not worry when they dropped a credit card hauled a invoice. They understood they can contact their lenders and tear it out fairly fast. But now, you might be a victim of identity theft and not even know it. This malicious offense is also difficult to prosecute because it is hard to recognize and track down the perpetrator.

In 2004, the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee issued a report with a few surprising data about identity theft. They estimated that roughly 27 million Americans were victims of identity theft from 1999-2004. Half of them did not understand how the thief had gotten their private info, though a quarter of these understood the identity theft generated from a lost or stolen credit card, checkbook, social security number, or private email. Some of the victims reported that the identity thief had used their private information to conduct a crime under a fictitious identity.

In 2003, the Federal Trade Commission reported that reports of identity theft were upward 33 percent from the year earlier, they had been conscious of over 200,000 instances of identity theft in 2003. States with the most reported cases of identity theft were Arizona, Nevada, California, Texas, and Florida. And for nearly three quarters of these fraud cases mentioned, using victims’ personal information was utilized for credit card, cell utility or phone, or bank fraud. They also discovered that, normally, the abuse of victims’ private information lasted from three to six months and led to a entire reduction of roughly $5 billion to sufferers, also over 300 million hours of private time resolving the issues once detected Fake id reviews.

The 2003 FTC Survey reported50 billion in reductions to company because of identity theft. They reported that, in that calendar year, each sufferer spent500 to $1200 and out of 30 to 60 private hours to get their credit issues solved. Regrettably, there’s very little expectation that this tendency will decline in the not too distant future. Identity theft appears to be getting easier, not more difficult, and the offenders are learning how to conceal their crimes from sufferers more and also to conceal their individual from law enforcement entirely.

Regrettably, there’s not any single database at the U.S. covering identity theft cases, along with also the Committee suspects that the amount of offenses are vastly underreported. Classifying these crimes as identity theft changes from state to state and out of police department to police division. The 2003 research demonstrated that 60 percent of victims of identity theft hadn’t reported the offense to their police department! Just one in five had reported the problem for their credit agency.

Identity theft offenses are researched at the national level by national agencies such as the Secret Service and the FBI. The Department of Justice generally prosecutes the cases via a regional U.S. Lawyers’ office. In 2000, U.S. Attorneys reported that they had registered over 2000 instances of identity theft throughout the country (compare this to the 9 million victims annually). That year, the Secret Service created over 3000 arrests, and typical real falls to victims in cases which were closed equaled around $46,000 each. The FBI reported 1425 convictions for identity theft, more than a million of those for fraud. The Postal Inspection Service created a bit over 1700 arrests in 2000. The IRS reported suspected and actual instances of identity theft in questionable tax yields in 2000, estimating that they’d obtained approximately 150 million deceptive returns and deceptive claims for over $750 million in refunds. Nowadays, the federal government admits that identity theft is the fastest-growing financial crime in the usa.

1 reason for the seemingly low percentage of prosecutions and convictions for identity theft has become the government’s inability to specify the particular crimes. In 1998, Congress passed the law addressing identity theft, the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act, making identity theft a termed federal offense and making it somewhat easier to prosecute. The Act created the Federal Trade Commission accountable for receipt of complaints and general public education about identity theft.

The Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act of 2004 established penalties for aggravated identity theft, such as those cases where identity theft has been utilized to perpetrate serious offenses. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act to tackle identity theft and related customer issues, which makes it possible for victims to use lenders and credit bureaus to remove negative information because of identity theft in their credit report. The Internet False Identification Act of 2000 amended the elderly False Identification Crime Control Act of 1982 to encircle computer-aided false identity offenses. Violators face fines and/or imprisonment for generating or transferring false identification documents.

Experts encourage individuals to become more proactive in taking steps to stop and detect identity theft. Certainly, preventing it from occurring in the first place is much less stressful than trying to solve issues after identity theft offenses are committed. Listed below are a Couple of of the things that you can do to protect your own financial information from identity theft offenders:

– Secure your personal data in any way times. Do not leave lists of account numbers unlocked, and do not share your user IDs or passwords with ANYone. Keep as much control over your own personal financial advice as possible.

You may also like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.